Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja dan Dampaknya terhadap Kinerja pada Unit Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia

Authors

  • Anita Primastiwi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi SBI Yogyakarta
  • Taufan Adi Kurniawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi SBI Yogyakarta
  • Sri Kiswati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi SBI Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32477/4ee38t70

Keywords:

contractibility, performance measurement system, incentive use, exploratory use

Abstract

The Indonesian government, through the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia, has regulated the accountability of public sector organization management through PermenPANRB Nomor 88 Tahun 2021. However, Government Agency Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) evaluation results for over the past 10 years show an average SAKIP score less than 75 out of 100, which is certainly far from expectations. This study attempts to analyze one of the reasons for the low SAKIP score by focusing on contractibility to determine the clarity of organizational goals so that organizational performance is easier to achieve and can satisfy all stakeholders. The results show that contractibility has a positive influence on organizational performance, but contractibility does not moderate the use of performance measurement systems for incentive purposes and exploratory purposes. The existence of contractibility, such as clear objectives, measurable performance, and the actor's knowledge of the transformation process, makes it easier for employees to complete their tasks. Meanwhile, contractibility does not moderate the use of performance measurement for incentive and exploratory purposes due to low levels of incentives, low levels of contractibility, and a top-down organizational structure that does not support feedback for exploratory purposes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2016). The Relationship Between The Use Of A Performance Measurement System , Organizational Factors , Accountability , And The Performance Of Public Sector Organizations. 31(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.10317

Fazri, E., Josiah, T., Pratiwi, E. U., Ainasya, A. R., & Adesti, D. (2022). Determinant Faktor Keberhasilan Penerapan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. 07(September), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.24967/ekombis.v7i2.1805

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia, (2021). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 88 Tahun 2021 tentang evaluasi akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2021 Nomor 1569

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2024, October). Tren kenaikan SAKIP selama 10 tahun, Menteri PANRB: Korelasi positif akuntabilitas kinerja dengan akselerasi pembangunan dan pengentasan kemiskinan. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/tren-kenaikan-sakip-selama-10-tahun-menteri-panrb-korelasi-positif-akuntabilitas-kinerja-dengan-akselerasi-pembangunan-dan-pengentasan-kemiskinan

Meyliana, Agustina, L., & Setiawan, C. (2018). Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Organisasi Perangkat Daerah di Kota Bandung. 10(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v10i2.1087

Milutinović, S., Medved, I., & Dimitrijević, D. (2024). Public Oversight and Performance Measurement in Public Sector Entities. 60(52), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.5937/AnEkSub2400007M

Muttaqin, G. F., & Mulyasari, W. (2018). Financial Accountability : Organizational Performance Improvement Through Culture Control and Contractibility. XXII(02), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v22i2.348

Primastiwi, A. (2016). Pengaruh Tekanan Eksternal Terhadap Penggunaan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Untuk Tujuan Operasional Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja. 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24964/ja.v4i2

Rahmaddhana, F. H., & Wike. (2021). Akuntabilitas Kinerja Bidang Pertamanan DISPERKIM Kota Malang dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. 7(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2021.007.01.14

Sari, E. P., Setiawan, S., & Adilah, A. R. (2017). Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Di Kota Bandung ( Studi Kasus Pada Dinas Pemakaman & Pertamanan ; Dinas Kependudukan & Pencatatan Sipil dan Dinas Pemuda dan Olahraga ). Maranatha, 9(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v9i2.483

Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. . (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004

Wijaya, I. N. A., Natalia, M., & Irenne, V. (2017). Pengaruh Penggunaan Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Pada Kinerja Organisasional Sektor Publik (Studi Kasus Pada Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan & Aset; Dinas Perpustakaan & Kearsipan; dan Badan Pengelolaan Pendapatan Daerah). Akurat, 8(3), 43–55. https://ejournal.unibba.ac.id/index.php/akurat/article/view/61

Downloads

Published

25-01-2026

How to Cite

Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja dan Dampaknya terhadap Kinerja pada Unit Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. (2026). Kajian Bisnis Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha, 34(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.32477/4ee38t70