FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KECURANGAN AKADEMIK PADA PERKULIAHAN ONLINE

STUDI PADA MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI UNIVERSITAS SARJANAWIYATA TAMANSISWA

  • Adia Adi Prabowo
  • Dewi Kusuma Wardani
Keywords: Online Cheating, Situational Factors, Academic Factors, psychological Factors

Abstract

The spread of the covid-19 disease outbreak has brought urgent changes in various
sectors. The government’s advice to stay at home and keep your distance should
be followed by a change in learning methods from face-to-face to online learning.
The purpose of this study is to explore the extent to which factors such as situational
factors, academic factors, and psychological factors can influence students’
academic cheating behavior during online learning, and to propose strategies to
promote academic integrity in higher education when learning is conducted on an
ounce line.This type of research is quantitative research with a descriptive
approach. The samples studied were all S1 Accounting Faculty of Economics
which is still active in the even semester of The Academic Year 2019/2020 who
had taken the online exam and learning online with a sample number of 153 students
using purposive sampling techniques. Data analysis techniques in this study using
PLS (Partial Least Square) 3.0 software. The results of this study showed that
psychological factors and academic factors have no significant effect on online
cheating. But situational factors as intervening variables have a significant effect
online cheating

Author Biographies

Adia Adi Prabowo

Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Dewi Kusuma Wardani

Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

References

Bandura, A. (1986a). Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986b). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Ellahi, A., Mushtaq, R., & Khan, M. B. (2013). Multi campus investigation of academic dishonesty in higher education of Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(6), 647– 666. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03- 2012-0039
Evans, E. D., & Craig, D. (1990). Teacher and student perceptions of academic cheating in middle and senior high schools. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 44–52.
Fadlilah, S. F. A. (2017). Analisis Faktor- Faktor Kecurangan Akademis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Ghofur, A. (2008). Pengaruh Suasana Akademik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Bahasa Asing Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa Asing Fbs Unimed. Jurnal Bahas Unimed. Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (Edisi 4). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hendricks, B. (2004). Academic dishonesty: A study in the magnitude of and justification for academic dishnesty among college undergraduate an graduate students. Journal of Student Development, 35, 212–260.
Jurdi, R., Hage, H. S., & Chow, H. P. H. (2011). Academic Dishonesty in the Canadian Classroom: Behaviours of a Sample of University Students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(3), 35–35.
King, C. G., Guyette, R. W., & Piotrowski, C. (2009). Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/ 10.9743/JEO.2009.1.5
Lambert, E. ., Hogan, N. ., & Barton, S. . (2003). Collegiate academic dishonestly revisited: What have they done, how often have they done it, who does it and why did they do it? Electronic Journal of Sociology.
Lonsdale, D. J. (2017). Intentions to Cheat: Ajzen’s Planned Behavior and Goal- Related Personality Facets. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 151(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00223980.2016.1241737
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(3), 522–538.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. . (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: a replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.
Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 870–885.
Murdiansyah, I., Sudarma, M., & Nurkholis. (2017). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi Universitas Brawijaya). Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 4(2), 121–133.
Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of Cheating among Early Adolescents: Academic and Social Motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1046
Nonis,S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2)(A multicampus investigation), 69–77.
Perry, A. R., Kane, K. M., Bernesser, K. J., & Spicker, P. T. (1990). Type a behavior, competitive achievement-striving and cheating among college students. Psychological Reports, 66, 459–465.
Purnamasari, D. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Educational Psychology Journal, 2(1), 13–21. Retrieved from file:///D:/My Documents/ Downloads/2581-Article Text-5082-1- 10-20131203.pdf
Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and Personal Causes of Student Cheating. Res High Educ, 50, 293–313.
Sagoro, E. M. (2013). Pensinergian Mahasiswa, Dosen, Dan Lembaga Dalam Pencegahan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 11(2), 54–67.
Published
2021-01-25
How to Cite
Prabowo, A., & Wardani, D. (2021). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KECURANGAN AKADEMIK PADA PERKULIAHAN ONLINE. Kajian Bisnis Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha, 29(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.32477/jkb.v29i1.235