STRATEGI PENINGKATAN AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH
Studi pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Temanggung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32477/jrabi.v2i3.574Keywords:
Strategy, Performance Accountability, SAKIPAbstract
The results of the evaluation of the performance accountability system of the Inspectorate Temanggung Regency have not been optimal. The research method used in this study is the Qualitative Research Method, which is descriptive analysis in the form of written or spoken words from the observed behavior, while the purpose of this study is to analyze what factors cause the accountability of the performance of Inspectorate Temanggung Regency not to comply with targets set and to formulate efforts to improve the performance of Inspectorate Temanggung Regency. The factors that cause the accountability of the performance of the Temanggung Regency is not optimal, namely the review of the Main Performance Indicators and the Renstra Review has not been carried out routinely, the report on the action plan has not been available, rewards and punishments have not been applied in achieving performance and reporting performance, and performance measurement has not used technology. information. Efforts that must be made by Inspectorate Temanggung Regency in increasing the value of SAKIP, namely Inspectorate Temanggung Regency must review the Main Performance Indicators and Review the Renstra Document of Inspectorate Temanggung Regency for 2019-2023, the Action plan that has been made by Inspectorate Temanggung Regency must be followed up with a report on the implementation of the plan Actions, rewards and punishments should be given to employees who have achieved good performance and reported performance and performance measurement should use information technology.
References
Abdul Halim Usman (2015) Manajemen Strategis Syariah: Teori, Konsep dan Aplikasi, Jakarta: Zikrul Hakim, 2015, h. 20.
Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2017). Akuntabilitas dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah: Semu atau Nyata. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Vol. 21, No.2
Ahyaruddin, M., & Akbar, R. (2018). Indonesian Local Government's Accountability and Performance: The Isomorphism Institutional Perspective. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, Vol.19, No.2
Akbar, R. (2011). Performance Measurement and Accountability in Indonesian Local Government.Ph.D dissertation, Curtin University.
Brigitta Clarabella Petta (2019).Implementasi Sistim Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi pada BAPPEDA dan Inspektorat Kabupaten Temanggung, Universitas Gajah Mada Yogyakarta
Basu Swastha dan Irawa (2009), Manajemen Pemasatan Modern, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009,h. 67.
Deasari, N. (2019). Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Studi Pada Pemerintah Kota Bontang. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta
Enditya Luhur Raharja,Lukman M Baga,A Faroby Falatehan (2018), Strategi Peningkatan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Kota Bogor, Jurnal Managemen Pembangunan Daerah, Vol.10, No. 2
Faisal, Sanapiah. 2005. Format-Format Penelitian Sosial,Jakarta. PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada
Hasni Yusrianti, Rika Henda Safitri (2015), Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Sakip) Pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) Di Lingkungan Pemerintah Kota Palembang, Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Sriwijaya Vol. 13 No.4
Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia No. 7 Tahun 1999 tentang Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
Jaaskelainen, A., & Laihonen, H. (2014). A Strategy Framework For Performance Measurement in the Public Sector. Public Money and Management.
Kloot, L. (1999). Performance Measurement and Accountability in Victorian Local Government. The International Journal Of Public Sector Management, Vol. 12 No. 7, 1999.
Kluvers, R. (2003). Accountabillity for Performance in Local Government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57-69.
Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Kabupaten Temanggung. 2020.
Lembaga Administasi Daerah, 1999
Lewis Mulford Adams, dkk, Websters World University Dictionary, Washington: D.C. Publisher Company, Inc, 1965, h. 1019.
M. Arifin (2008). Psikologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, h. 39.
Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi No. 53 Tahun 2014 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perjanjian Kinerja, Pelaporan Kinerja, dan Tata Cara Reviu atas Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi No. 12 Tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Atas Implementasi SAKIP
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 8 Tahun 2006. Pelaporan Keuangan dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
Peraturan Presiden No. 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
Sevi, Z. (2005). Measuring Performance On a Local Government Level in a Transitional Country: the case of Serbia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 18(7).
Sinclair, A. 1995. The chameleon of accountability: forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society.
Sondang P. Siagaan (2008). Manajemen Stratejik, Jakarta: Bumi aksara, h. 15
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Mahmudi, 2010. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Penerbit UUP STIM YKPN,. Yogakarta
Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta
Yuvita Isni Kadratin (2017). Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Dinas tenaga Kerja, Sosial dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Magelang Berdasarkan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) Tahun 2020, STIE Widya Wiwaha Yogyakarta
