DAMPAK MOTIVASI, DISIPLIN KERJA DAN KEPUASAN KERJA TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KINERJA PEGAWAI DI LINGKUNGAN SEKRETARIAT DAERAH KABUPATEN TEMANGGUNG

Authors

  • Dian Nurhening STIE Widya Wiwaha
  • Insiatiningsih Insiatiningsih STIE Widya Wiwaha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32477/jrabi.v2i4.616

Keywords:

Motivation, Work Discipline, Job Satisfaction, Performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of motivation, work discipline and job satisfaction on improving employee performance in the Regional Secretariat of Temanggung Regency. The research method used was quantitative and qualitative where this research was conducted at the Regional Secretariat of Temanggung Regency with a sample of 64 employees as respondents. The research data was obtained through collecting questionnaire results which were distributed directly and interviews through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) to respondents in the Temanggung Regional Secretariat. The data collection technique used a questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. The data analysis technique used multiple linear regression analysis and the data was processed with SPSS software. The research questionnaire consists of 45 question items, which contain independent variables namely Work Motivation (X1), Work Discipline (X2), Job Satisfaction (X3) and the Dependent Variable (Y) in this study is performance. The method used for sampling is simple random sampling technique, namely the sampling of members of the population is done randomly and all respondents are considered the same or homogeneous without regard to strata in the population such as gender, age, rank and so on. The results of the multiple linear regression analysis yield the following equation Y = 24.065 + 0.148 X1 – 0.031 X2 + 0.427 X3 meaning that the job satisfaction variable has the most dominant influence on employee performance, which is the result of a regression coefficient of 0.427. Then followed by the second variable that affects the performance variable, namely work motivation with a regression coefficient of 0.148. Whereas the work discipline variable has no effect on performance, because the regression coefficient is -0.031. The results of the F test show that together the independent variables namely motivation, work discipline and job satisfaction affect performance because they have an F-count of 7.686 greater than the F-table of 2.76 and a significant value of 0.000 which is smaller than alpha (0.05). Because the F-value greather than F-table, Ha is accepted, and the first hypothesis is proven. The results of the t test analysis found that the most dominant variable was job satisfaction (X3), that is, when viewed from the beta value of the job satisfaction variable (X3), the greatest value was 0.513. In addition, it was also obtained that the t-count of the variable of job satisfaction has the greatest value of the t-count of other variables and is also greater than the t-table of 1.998, where the t-count of the variable of job satisfaction is 3.821. From the results of this t test proves that the second hypothesis, namely job satisfaction has the greatest impact on improving employee performance, proven and accepted.

References

As’ad, M. 1999. Seri Ilmu Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Psikologo Industri. Edisi IV, Yogyakarta : Liberty

Abdullah, 2006. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Locus of Control dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Semarang Barat. Tesis, UNDIP Semarang.

Candosa, 2002, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Ansi offset, Yogyakarta.

Crimson, Sitanggang, 2005, Analisis Pengaruh Prilaku Pemimpin Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Sekretariat Kotamadya Jak-Bar. Skripsi, UNDIP Semarang.

Ferdinand, Augusty. 2006. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Edisi 2. BP Universitas

Diponegoro. Semarang.

Gibson, J. L, John, M. L, James, H. D. Jr. 1996. Organization: Behavior, Structure, Processes. 8th Edition. Illionis: Richard D. Irwin. Inc

Gibson, 2001, Organisasi : Perilaku Struktur dan Proses. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Erlangga

Hani T Handoko. 1996. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

_______________, 1999. Manajeman Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

_______________, 2001. Manajeman Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Heidjrahman R, 2003, Organisasi dan Manajemen Perilaku Struktur dan Proses, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta

Heidjrachman Ranupandojo dan Suad Husnan. 2002. Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: BPFE

http://akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/konsep-disiplin-kerja/, diakses tanggal 12 April 2012.

http://karamhamzal.blogspot.com/2012/02/hubungan-motivasi-kerja-dan-disiplin.html, diakses tanggal 11 April 2012.

http://www.kellyglobal.net/eprise/main/web/us/hr_manager/articles, diakses tanggal 10 Juli 2012.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19470904/Otonomi-Daerah, diakses tanggal 9 April 2012.

http://www.uny.ac.id/berita/ft/peningkatan-kinerja-dan-disiplin-pns-ft-uny,diakses tanggal 9 April 2012.

I Wayan Sudiana, 2010. Pengaruh Locus of control Pada Hubungan Antara Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Kinerja Auditor (Studi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bali). Tesis, Universitas Udayana Denpasar.

Imam M, 2002, Kepemimpinan dan Keorganisasian, UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Indra W, 2005, Perilaku Organisasi, Sinar Baru, Jakarta.

Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi 10th. Edisi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.

Minardi, 2001. Motivasi dan Pemotivasian Dalam Manajemen. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Moh As’ad. 2003. Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Libery.

Nitisemito, Alex S, 1996, Manajemen Personalia (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia), Edisi Ketiga, Indonesia: Ghalia

Robbins, P Stephen. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: PT. Tema.

Robbin, Stephen. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep, Kontroversi-Aplikasi. Jilid 2 Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Prenhallindo.

_______________, 2001. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

_______________, 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sekaran, Uma. 2006. Research Methode For Business: Metodologi Penelitian Untuk bisnis. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Siagian.SP, 1993. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.

Siagian.SP, 2002. FilsafatAdministrasi. PT Gunung Agung Jakarta

Simmons, K, 1999, Happy Boss-Happy Employee, artikel: The economic Press Inc.

Simmamora, J. 1995, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta: Penerbit STIE YKPN.

Siswanto, B. 1989. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia, Cetakan Kedua, Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Soesilo, W, 2006, Efisiensi dan Efektifitas Kerja Dalam Organisasi, Gramedia, Jakarta.

Soemanto, Wasty, 1987. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bina Aksara.

Sofyan, S, 2006, Manajemen Kontemporer, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Sugiyono, 2002, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R & D , Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Umar, Husein (2001), SDM dan Organisasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Nurhening, D., & Insiatiningsih, I. (2022). DAMPAK MOTIVASI, DISIPLIN KERJA DAN KEPUASAN KERJA TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KINERJA PEGAWAI DI LINGKUNGAN SEKRETARIAT DAERAH KABUPATEN TEMANGGUNG. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 2(4), 1158 –. https://doi.org/10.32477/jrabi.v2i4.616